Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated from Clinical Samples using Colorimetric Method

Main Article Content

Iskender Karalti Günay Tülay Colakoglu Zuhal Tekkanat Tazegun Zehra Kipritci Yeşim Gürol Gülden Celik

Abstract

It was aimed to determine the antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from patients by the colorimetric method, one of the standard modifications. Therefore ‘Sensititre YeastOne’ using an indicator alamar blue standard commercial kit was used.


The samples from patients applied to Yeditepe University Hospital Medical Microbiology Laboratory between years 2009-2011 were included to the study. 149 strains were isolated from 136 samplas. These strains were isolated from abscess, mouth swab, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, urine and urine catheter, blood culture, catheter, tracheal aspirate, sterile body fluid, vaginal swab and wound swab samples. Candida, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida dubliniensis, Candida krusei and, Candida incons./norveqen. of genus Candida were isolated.


Antifungal susceptibility tests were applied for seven antifungals including fluconazole, caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericin B, posaconazole, itraconazole and 5- flusitosine. There was no resistant strain to caspofungin although the most resistant group was found in azole group antifungals. The resistance rates for fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, 5- flusitosine, respectively were as 18.8%,13.4%,37.6%,2.7%. For amphotericin B and posaconazole minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) values because of in vivo-in vitro discrepancy, were excluded from the evaluation. It was performed by E TEST method, because of high fluconazole resistance rate and the same resistance rate was observed.


Because of easy evaluation, this test is found as a practical test for antifungal susceptibility.

Keywords: Candida, Colorimetric, Antifungal, Sensititre YeastOne

Article Details

How to Cite
KARALTI, Iskender et al. Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated from Clinical Samples using Colorimetric Method. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 11, dec. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7131>. Date accessed: 10 dec. 2025.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Iyer RS, Pal RB, Patel RY, Banker DD. Polymerase chain reaction based diagnosis of systemic fungal infections and sensitivity testing of the fungal isolates. Indian J. Med Microbiol., 2002; 20:132-136.
2. Gürol Y, Karaltı I, Oztürk Y, Tazegün TT, Yılmaz, G. Poster: Onkoloji servisinde yatan hastalardan izole edilen Candida türlerinin kolorimetrik yöntem ile antifungal duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi. 24. ANKEM Congress, Fethiye, May, 2009:106.
3. Kuo-Wei C, Hsiu-Jung L, Yu-Hui L, Shu-Ying L. Comparison of four molecular typing methods to assess genetic relatedness of Candida albicans clinical isolates in Taiwan. J. of Med. Microbiol. 2005; 54:249–258.
4. Pasqualotto A.C. Differences in pathogenicity and clinical syndromes due to Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. Med. Mycol. 2009; 47:1-10.
5. Gharizadeh B, Norberg E, Löffler J et al. Identification of medically important fungi by the Pyrosequencing technology. Mycoses. 2004; 47:29-33.
6. Schabereiter-Gurtner C, Selitsch B, Rotter ML, Hirschl AM, Willinger B. Development of novel real-time PCR assays for detection and differentiation of eleven medically important Aspergillus and Candida species in clinical specimens Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007; 45:906–914.
7. Tarini NMA, Wahid MH, Fera I, Yasmon A, Djauzi S. Development of multiplex-PCR assay for rapid detection of Candida spp. Medical Journal of Indonesia 2010; 19:83-87.
8. Carrillo-Muñoz AJ, Quindós G. Ruesga M et al. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with Sensititre Yeast One. Mycoses. 2006; 49:293-7.
9. Sensititre YeastOne Antifungal Susceptibility Test Kit Prospectus. TREK DiagnosticSystems UK 2010;1-10.
10. Wilke TA, Güner S, Doğanay M. Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Mikrobiyolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Medical Publishing, 2008.
11. Chryssanthou E. Trends in antifungal susceptibility among Swedish Candida species bloodstream ısolates from 1994 to 1998 Comparison of the E-test and the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel with the NCCLS M27-A reference method. Journal of Clinical Microbiolology. 2001; 39:4181–4183.
12. Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M. Messer AS. Multicenter comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A reference method for testing clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and other yeasts and yeast-like organisms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999; 37:591–595.
13. Martina R, Wächtlerb B, Schallerc M, Wilsonb D, Hubeb B. Host–pathogen interactions and virulence-associated genes during Candida albicans oral infections. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2011; 301:417-422.
14. Wächtler B, Wilson D, Haedicke K, Dalle F, Hube B. From attachment to damage İdentified genes of Candida albicans mediate adhesion, invasion and damage during interaction with oral epithelial cells. Plos One. 2011; 23:1-14.
15. de Toro M. Torres MJ, Maite R, Aznar J. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates. Clinical Microbiolology and Infection. 2011; 17:418-424.
16. Borghi E, Sciota R, Iatta R, Biassoni C, Montagna MT, Morace G. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis complex strains isolated from invasive fungal infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2011; 30:1-5.
17. Tortorano AM, Biraghi E, Astolfi A et al. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective survey of candidaemia: report from one Italian region. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2002; 41:297–304.
18. Almirante B, Rodríguez D, Cuenca-Estrella M. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections: Case–control population-based surveillance study of patients in Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003. Journal of Clinical Microbiolology. 2006; 44:4181–4183.
19. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2007; 20:133–163.
20. Balkan II, Savaş A, Geduk A, Yemisen M, Mete B, Ozaras R. Candida glabrata perinephric abscess. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2011; 43:63-65.
21. Willke A. Kandidemi: Nasıl değerlendirilmeli ne yapılmalı? Turkish Journal of Infection. 2007; 21:117-122.
22. Koç NA. Antifungal duyarlılık testleri ve klinik önemi. Ankem Journal. 2010; 26 (Annex 2):270-276.
23. Demirbilek M, Timurkaynak F, Can F, Azap O, Arslan H. Hastane kaynaklı Candida türlerinde biyofilm oluşumu ve antifungal duyarlılık paternleri. Microbiological Bulletin. 2007; 41: 261-269.
24. Evci C, Ener B, Göral G, Akçağlar S. Comparative evaluation of the antifungal susceptibility of Candida isolates from blood specimens: results of a study in a tertiary care hospital in Bursa, Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 2010; 40(1):141-149.
25. Atalay MA; Sav H, Demir G, Koç NA. Kan kültürlerinden izole edilen Candida türlerinin dağılımı ve amfoterisin B ve flukonazole in vitro duyarlılıkları. Medicine Journal of Selçuk. 2012; 28(3):149-151.
26. Altuncu E, Bilgen E, Çerikçioğlu E, Ilki A, Ulger N, Bakır M, Akman I, Ozek E. Neonatal kandida enfeksiyonları ve etkenlerinin antifungal duyarlılıkları. Microbiological Bulletin. 2010; 44: 593-603.
27. Koçoğlu E, Bayram A, Balcı I. Klinik örneklerden izole edilen kandida türleri ve antifungal duyarlılıkları. Medical Journal of Van. 2005; 12:195-200.
28. Cornely OA, Sprute R, Bassetti M, Chen SC, Groll AH, Kurzai O, Lass-Flörl C, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Revathi G, Santolaya ME, White PL, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Arendrup MC, Baddley J, Barac A, Ben-Ami R, Brink AJ, Grothe JH, Guinea J, Hagen F, Hochhegger B, Hoenigl M, Husain S, Jabeen K, Jensen HE, Kanj SS, Koehler P, Lehrnbecher T, Lewis RE, Meis JF, Nguyen MH, Pana ZD, Rath PM, Reinhold I, Seidel D, Takazono T, Vinh DC, Zhang SX, Afeltra J, Al-Hatmi AMS, Arastehfar A, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bongomin F, Carlesse F, Chayakulkeeree M, Chai LYA, Chamani-Tabriz L, Chiller T, Chowdhary A, Clancy CJ, Colombo AL, Cortegiani A, Corzo Leon DE, Drgona L, Dudakova A, Farooqi J, Gago S, Ilkit M, Jenks JD, Klimko N, Krause R, Kumar A, Lagrou K, Lionakis MS, Lmimouni BE, Mansour MK, Meletiadis J, Mellinghoff SC, Mer M, Mikulska M, Montravers P, Neoh CF, Ozenci V, Pagano L, Pappas P, Patterson TF, Puerta-Alcalde P, Rahimli L, Rahn S, Roilides E, Rotstein C, Ruegamer T, Sabino R, Salmanton-García J, Schwartz IS, Segal E, Sidharthan N, Singhal T, Sinko J, Soman R, Spec A, Steinmann J, Stemler J, Taj-Aldeen SJ, Talento AF, Thompson GR 3rd, Toebben C, Villanueva-Lozano H, Wahyuningsih R, Weinbergerová B, Wiederhold N, Willinger B, Woo PCY, Zhu LP. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of candidiasis: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 May; 25(5):e280-e293. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00749-7. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr;25(4):e203. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25) 00154-9. Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 May;25(5):e261. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25) 00252-X.