↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are highly prevalent and often undertreated conditions in postmenopausal women, partly due to concerns about adverse effects and cost of pharmacologic therapies. Bone-Viva is a multi-ingredient nutraceutical formulation designed to support bone metabolism through nutritional and biochemical pathways. 

Objective: To determine whether Bone-Viva stabilizes or improves bone mineral density (BMD) in women with osteopenia or osteoporosis and to evaluate its comparative and additive effects relative to denosumab, romosozumab, and combination therapy (Bone-Viva plus either denosumab or romosozumab).

Methods: This retrospective observational analysis included 51 women aged 54"“90 years with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Patients received Bone-Viva monotherapy (n=12), denosumab (n=13), romosozumab (n=13), or Bone-Viva combined with either agent (n=13). Baseline and 1-year DEXA scans (Hologic Horizon W) assessed T-scores at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. T-score changes were categorized as improved, stable, or declined using a ±0.1 threshold. Adverse events were recorded.

Results: The largest lumbar spine improvements of occurred with combination therapy T-score of (+0.20) and denosumab T-score of (+0.18), with 60"“65% of patients improving. romosozumab produced a T-score +0.12 increase (48% improved), and Bone-Viva monotherapy showed a t-score +0.18 increase (42% improved). Femoral neck changes were modest for all groups. All groups showed   excellent stability of (60%) in the femoral neck. At the total hip, all groups demonstrated small but consistent gains, led by combination therapy (+0.17). Bone-Viva stabilized T-scores in 45"“48% of patients. One minor adverse event (transient stomach discomfort) was reported.

Conclusion: Bone-Viva was well tolerated and appeared to stabilize or modestly improve T-scores, particularly in patients with early bone loss. Combination therapy yielded the greatest overall improvements, suggesting potential synergistic benefit. Bone-Viva may offer a safe, economical adjunct or alternative for individuals seeking non-pharmacologic approaches to maintaining bone health. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 13 No 12 (2025): Vol.13 Issue 12 December 2025
SectionResearch Articles
Published28 December 2025
DOI10.18103/mra.v13i12.7140
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

RY

Ronald Yglesias

Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties Research, Aventura, FL, USA

JS

Joanne Sagliani

Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties Research, Aventura, FL, USA

NG

Norman Gaylis

Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties Research, Aventura, FL, USA; NVIROMUNE Bone Viva, Aventura, FL, USA

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗