Digital Health Information Systems and Rural Health Equity: China's Experience in Global Context
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Rural-urban health disparities persist globally despite decades of interventions. Digital health information systems offer promise for addressing these inequities, yet implementation remains uneven and evidence fragmented.
Aim: To develop a comprehensive conceptual framework for understanding how digital health information systems promote rural health equity and to synthesize evidence from China's large-scale implementation experience alongside international comparisons.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature synthesis and policy analysis to develop a four-dimensional conceptual framework examining health information education, sharing, application, and governance. We analyzed China's digital health policies and implementation outcomes alongside international case studies and comparative evidence from peer-reviewed literature and policy documents.
Results: Digital health systems improve rural health equity through multiple mechanisms: education interventions enhance health literacy and promote behavior change; information sharing reduces asymmetries and enables care coordination; technology applications extend specialist expertise to underserved areas; and governance frameworks ensure quality, privacy, and participation. China's experience demonstrates substantial impacts including increased primary care utilization, improved chronic disease management, reduced medical expenditures, and enhanced insurance portability. However, effects exhibit heterogeneity across populations, with differential benefits for younger, better-educated individuals raising equity concerns.
Conclusions: Digital health information systems can meaningfully advance rural health equity when implemented comprehensively with attention to infrastructure, governance, and equity. Success requires integrated approaches spanning education, sharing, application, and governance rather than fragmented single-purpose initiatives.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MG. Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: How does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health. 2008;16(2):56-66.
3. World Health Organization. Increasing Access to Health Workers in Remote and Rural Areas Through Improved Retention. WHO Press; 2010.
4. Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Krupinski EA, Grigsby J. Sustaining and realizing the promise of telemedicine. Telemed e-Health. 2013;22(2):93-112.
5. Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e24087.
6. Kruse CS, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4-12.
7. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2010;36(1):241-277.
8. Lupton D. Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociol Compass. 2014;8(12):1344-1359.
9. National Health Commission of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2022. Peking Union Medical College Press; 2022.
10. Arcury TA, Quandt SA. Delivery of health services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:345-363.
11. Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. Rural health: Why it matters. Med J Aust. 2011;195(9):502-503.
12. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328-335.
13. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211.
14. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259-267.
15. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, et al. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2):97-107.
16. Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. National Academies Press; 2004.
17. Kickbusch I. Health literacy: Addressing the health and education divide. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(3):289-297.
18. Li Q, Zang W, An L. Peer effect and school dropout in rural China. China Econ Rev. 2013; 27:238-248.
19. Loh C, Li Q. Peer effects in adolescent bodyweight: Evidence from rural China. Soc Sci Med. 2013;85:35-44.
20. van Dijk JA. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage Publications; 2005.
21. van Deursen AJ, Helsper EJ. The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? Commun Inf Technol Annu. 2015;10:29-52.
22. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425-478.
23. Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2017;101:75-84.
24. Siddiqi S, Masud TI, Nishtar S, et al. Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: Gateway to good governance. Health Policy. 2009;90(1):13-25.
25. Li Q, An L, Xu J, Baliamoune-Lutz M. Corruption costs lives: Evidence from a cross-country study. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19(1):153-165.
26. Li Q, An L. Corruption takes away happiness: Evidence from a cross-country study. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(2):485-504.
27. Li Q, Loh CA, Ye Y. Shushing the press shortens lives: Cross-national evidence of the impact of press freedom on life expectancy. Scand J Public Health. 2024. doi:10.1177/14034948231178841
28. Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for Health in the 21st Century. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
29. MacDowell M, Glasser M, Fitts M, et al. A national view of rural health workforce issues in the USA. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10:1531.
30. Bennett IM, Chen J, Soroui JS, White S. The contribution of health literacy to disparities in self-rated health status and preventive health behaviors in older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3):204-211.
31. Diviani N, van den Putte B, Giani S, van Weert JC. Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e112.
32. Li Q, Liu G, Zang W. The health of left-behind children in rural China. China Econ Rev. 2015; 36:367-376.
33. Ye Y, Li Q. Unanticipated benefits: Left-behind peers and improved health in rural Chinese classrooms. Appl Econ Lett. 2024. doi:10.1080/ 13504851.2024.2332532
34. Li Q, Ye Y, An L. Reduced sexual activity and increased sexually transmitted infections risk among left-behind women in rural China. Forthcoming.
35. Ye Y, He Q, Li Q, An L. The brother's penalty: Son preference and girls' health in rural China. Health Econ. 2024;33(8):1748-1771.
36. Li Q, An L. Intergenerational health consequence of the 1959-1961 Great Famine in rural China. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;18:27-40.
37. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370-379.
38. Yi M, Yao S, Jiang D. Online health information seeking behavior in China: A review. Health Commun. 2016;31(10):1260-1274.
39. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013;11(3):256-270.
40. Zhang L, Cheng G, Song S, et al. Healthcare expenditure and insurance portability among rural Chinese migrants. Soc Sci Med. 2019;227:42-49.
41. Thomas EE, Haydon HM, Mehrotra A, et al. Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare. 2015; 21(7):388-394.
42. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, et al. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449):1166.
43. Cornwall A. Unpacking 'participation': Models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J. 2008; 43(3):269-283.
44. Chen M, Zhao Y, Si L. Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244081.
45. Shaw R, Kim YK, Hua J. Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;6:100090.