Cost- Effectiveness of Routine Opt-Out Screening for HIV, HCV, and STIs in U.S. Jails within "Hotspots"

Main Article Content

Claire Wolfer-Jenkins, BS Anna Pollak Justin Berk, MD MPH MBA Timothy Flanigan, MA MD

Abstract

Background: Incarcerated populations experience disproportionately high rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), particularly in geographic "hotspot" areas. Despite Center of Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for routine opt-out screening, most U.S. jails rely on risk-based approaches that miss a substantial proportion of infections. Missing opportunities to treat for these infectious diseases in jails represents a significant issue; reducing the prevalence of communicable diseases on a national level requires addressing carceral hotspot areas.


Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of routine opt-out versus risk-based screening for HIV, HCV, chlamydia, syphilis, and gonorrhea in jails located within infection hotspots.


Methods: We created Markov state transition models using parameters derived from existing literature for five major infections – HIV, HCV, chlamydia, syphilis, and gonorrhea. With these models, we ran simulations that showcase the predicted number of infected incarcerated individuals who receive treatment with opt-out screening versus risk-based screening. Using health utility values and treatment costs, we calculated the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for all infection models that we compared to a Willingness to Pay Threshold (WTP) to assess the relative cost effectiveness of opt-out screening and risk-based screening.


Results: For STI models, opt-out screening shows high cost-effectiveness relative to the WTP, with ICER values being far below the $100,000 WTP (ranging from $727 to $4,941 additional cost for opt-out screening per QALY gained). The HCV model showed moderate cost effectiveness with opt-out screening, with an ICER of $85,760 per QALY gained, whereas the HIV model was not cost-effective. Additionally, a higher proportion of infected individuals are estimated to be able to complete full treatment course while incarcerated with opt-out screening. Considerable gains were seen with the chlamydia and syphilis models with 20.5% and 22.8% more infection positive cases estimated to be fully treatable during incarceration respectively.


Conclusions: Routine opt-out screening for most infectious diseases examined is highly cost-effective in hotspot jails. Our findings support prioritizing opt-out screening implementation in high-burden correctional facilities as a strategy to improve individual health outcomes and reduce community transmission.

Article Details

How to Cite
WOLFER-JENKINS, Claire et al. Cost- Effectiveness of Routine Opt-Out Screening for HIV, HCV, and STIs in U.S. Jails within "Hotspots". Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 1, jan. 2026. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7188>. Date accessed: 03 feb. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v14i1.7188.
Keywords
Infectious disease, HIV, HCV, STIs, Cost effectiveness, Carceral Health Care
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Spaulding AC, Rabeeah Z, Del Mar González-Montalvo M, et al. Prevalence and Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(Suppl_2):S193-S217. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac122

2. Morris MD, Brown B, Allen SA. Universal opt-out screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) within correctional facilities is an effective intervention to improve public health. Int J Prison Health. 2017;13(3-4):192-199. doi:10.1108/IJPH-07-2016-0028

3. Solomon L, Montague BT, Beckwith CG, et al. Survey finds that many prisons and jails have room to improve HIV testing and coordination of postrelease treatment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(3):434-442. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1115

4. Gaydos CA, Van Der Pol B, Jett-Goheen M, et al. Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(6):1666-1672. doi:10.1128/JCM.03461-12

5. Hutchinson AB, MacGowan RJ, Margolis AD, et al. Costs and Consequences of Eliminating a Routine, Point-Of-Care HIV Screening Program in a High-Prevalence Jail. Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(5 Suppl 1):S32-S38. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.006
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023 STI Surveillance Report: State Ranking Tables. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; Published 2024. Accessed November 15, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/media/pdfs/2024/10/2023-STD-Surveillance-State-Ranking-Tables.pdf

7. SeyedAlinaghi SA, Pashaei Z, Rahimi E, et al. Retracted: Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and associated risk behaviors in prisoners: a systematic review. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(5):e819. doi:10.1002/hsr2.819

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance, 2024 (Provisional). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2025. Accessed September 1, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/index.html

9. Bishod C. The dangers of undiagnosed sexually transmitted infections. American Society for Microbiology. August 28, 2025. Accessed December 12, 2025. https://asm.org/articles/2022/december/the-dangers-of-undiagnosed-sexually-transmitted-in.

10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Alert Template for Disseminated Gonococcal Infection (DGI). CDC; April 23, 2024. Accessed September 20, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/sti/php/sti-program-resources/health-alert-template-for-dgi.html

11. Peterman TA, O'Connor K, Bradley HM, Torrone EA, Bernstein KT. Gonorrhea Control, United States, 1972-2015, A Narrative Review. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(12):725-730. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000515

12. Kreisel KM, Weston EJ, St Cyr SB, Spicknall IH. Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among US Men and Women, 2018. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(4):222-231. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001382

13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Eliminating the Public Health Problem of Hepatitis B and C in the United States: Phase One Report. National Academies Press; 2016. Accessed September 30, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/5501/chapter/27

14. Aether Health. How much is an STD test? Aether Health Blog. Published October 14, 2024. Updated February 24, 2025. Accessed November 15, 2025. https://aetherhealth.org/blog/how-much-is-an-std-test/

15. Kumar S, Chesson H, Gift TL. Estimating the Direct Medical Costs and Productivity Loss of Outpatient Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(2):e18-e21. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001240

16. Kouyoumdjian FG, Leto D, John S, Henein H, Bondy S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in incarcerated persons. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(4):248-254. doi:10.1258/ijsa.2011.011194

17. Herzog SA, Althaus CL, Heijne JC, et al. Timing of progression from Chlamydia trachomatis infection to pelvic inflammatory disease: a mathematical modelling study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:187. Published 2012 Aug 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-187

18. Malhotra M, Sood S, Mukherjee A, Muralidhar S, Bala M. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(3):303-316.

19. Hoenderboom BM, van Benthem BHB, van Bergen JEAM, et al. Relation between Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in a Dutch cohort of women previously tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95(4):300-306. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2018-053778

20. Rönn MM, Li Y, Gift TL, et al. Costs, health benefits, and cost-effectiveness of chlamydia screening and partner notification in the United States, 2000–2019: a mathematical modeling analysis. Sex Transm Dis. 2023;50(6):351-358. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001786

21. Wong NS, Huang S, Zheng H, et al. Stages of syphilis in South China – a multilevel analysis of early diagnosis. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):135. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-4004-y

22. Miao P, Terris-Prestholt F, Fairley CK, et al. Ignored and undervalued in public health: a systematic review of health state utility values associated with syphilis infection. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024;22(1):17. Published 2024 Feb 13. doi:10.1186/s12955-024-02234-1

23. SingleCare Services, LLC. Bicillin L-A: Coupons & Prices. SingleCare website. Published November 14, 2025. Accessed October 1, 2025. https://www.singlecare.com/prescription/bicillin-l-a

24. Bureau of Justice Statistics. HIV in Prisons, 2023 – Statistical Tables. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; June 2025. Accessed October 2, 2025. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/hiv-prisons-2023-statistical-tables

25. Wohl DA, Golin C, Rosen DL, May JM, White BL. Detection of undiagnosed HIV among state prison entrants. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2198-2199. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280740

26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National HIV Prevention and Care Objectives for 2025. CDC website. Published March 31, 2023. Accessed October 3, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv-data/nhss/national-hiv-prevention-and-care-objectives-2025.html

27. Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Key strategies — Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. HIV.gov website. Published September 18, 2025. Accessed October 4, 2025. https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/ending-the-hiv-epidemic/key-strategies

28. Rich JD, Chandler R, Williams BA, et al. How health care reform can transform the health of criminal justice-involved individuals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(3):462-467. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1133

29. Puolakka V, Huikuri A, Haapio M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in the emergency department using a rapid HIV test instrument. Med Decis Making. 2023;43(7):869-882. doi:10.1177/0272989X02238300

30. Yeung MW, Young J, Moodie E, et al. Changes in quality of life, healthcare use, and substance use in HIV/hepatitis C coinfected patients after hepatitis C therapy: a prospective cohort study. HIV Clin Trials. 2015;16(3):100-110. doi:10.1179/501100000024

31. Hutchinson AB, MacGowan RJ, Margolis AD, Adee MG, Wen W, Bowden CJ, Spaulding AC.
Costs and consequences of eliminating a routine, point-of-care HIV screening program in a high-prevalence jail.
Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(5 Suppl 1):S32-S38. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.006

32. Zaller N, Thurmond P, Rich JD. Limited spending: an analysis of correctional expenditures on antiretrovirals for HIV-infected prisoners. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(1):49-54. doi:10.1177/003335490712200107

33. Spaulding AC, Akiyama MJ, Nijhawan AE, et al. Table 1. Calculated point prevalence of hepatitis C virus viremic individuals in US prison systems by state, December 2021. In: Spaulding AC, Akiyama MJ, Nijhawan AE, et al. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(Suppl 3):S160-S167. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiad227

34. Spaulding AC, Thomas DL. Screening for HCV infection in jails. JAMA. 2012;307(12):1259-1260. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.374

35. Levin J. Summary from 2014 AASLD: Hepatitis C (Boston Nov 7–11, 2014). NATAP website. Published November 10, 2014. Accessed October 3, 2025. https://www.natap.org/2014/AASLD/AASLD_93.htm

36. Saeed YA, Phoon A, Bielecki JM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of health utilities in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Value Health. 2020;23(1):127-137. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.008

37. Lee HW, Lee H, Kim BK, Chang Y, Jang JY, Kim DY. Cost-effectiveness of chronic hepatitis C screening and treatment. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022;28(2):164-173. doi:10.3350/cmh.2021.0193

38. U.S. Department of Justice. Federal Prison System FY 2021 Performance Budget Congressional Submission. U.S. Department of Justice; 2021. Accessed October 5, 2025. https://www.justice.gov/doj/page/file/1246231/download

39. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Jail Inmates in 2023 – Statistical Tables. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; April 8, 2025. Accessed November 15, 2025. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/jail-inmates-2023-statistical-tables

40. Quilter LA, Tang EC, Johnson KA, et al. 1520. Mind the Clap: Reported Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in the United States, 2020–2022. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(Suppl 2):ofac492.082. Published 2022 Dec 15. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.082

41. Creighton S. Gonorrhoea. BMJ Clin Evid. 2014;2014:1604. Published 2014 Feb 21.

42. Herzog SA, Althaus CL, Heijne JC, et al. Timing of progression from Chlamydia trachomatis infection to pelvic inflammatory disease: a mathematical modelling study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:187. Published 2012 Aug 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-187

43. Rönn MM, Li Y, Gift TL, Chesson HW, Menzies NA, Hsu K, et al. Costs, health benefits, and cost-effectiveness of chlamydia screening and partner notification in the United States, 2000–2019: a mathematical modeling analysis. Sex Transm Dis. 2023;50(6):351-358. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001786

44. Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Wolffs PFG, De Vries H, et al. Treatment Effectiveness of Azithromycin and Doxycycline in Uncomplicated Rectal and Vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women: A Multicenter Observational Study (FemCure). Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(11):1946-1954. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz050

45. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Treponema pallidum (Syphilis). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. Accessed October 10, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK384904/

46. Stamm LV. Syphilis: Re-emergence of an old foe. Microb Cell. 2016;3(9):363-370. Published 2016 Jun 27. doi:10.15698/mic2016.09.523

47. Ricco J, Westby A. Syphilis: Far from ancient history. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(2):91-98. Accessed October 10, 2025. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/0715/p91.html

48. Clement ME, Okeke NL, Hicks CB. Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(18):1905-1917. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13259

49. Matuschke A, Sadri I, Bogner JR, Goebel FD. Uberlebenszeit bei HIV-Infektion und AIDS [Survival in HIV infection and AIDS]. Versicherungsmedizin. 1992;44(3):71-75.

50. Poorolajal J, Hooshmand E, Mahjub H, Esmailnasab N, Jenabi E. Survival rate of AIDS disease and mortality in HIV-infected patients: a meta-analysis. Public Health. 2016;139:3-11. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.05.004

51. Mujugira A, Celum C, Coombs RW, et al. HIV Transmission Risk Persists During the First 6 Months of Antiretroviral Therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(5):579-584. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001019

52. Martin NK, Vickerman P, Brew IF, et al. Is increased hepatitis C virus case-finding combined with current or 8-week to 12-week direct-acting antiviral therapy cost-effective in UK prisons? A prevention benefit analysis. Hepatology. 2016;63(6):1796-1808. doi:10.1002/hep.28497

53. Kumar R, Kumar S, Prakash SS. Compensated liver cirrhosis: Natural course and disease-modifying strategies. World J Methodol. 2023;13(4):179-193. Published 2023 Sep 20. doi:10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.179

54. Mukerji AN, Patel V, Jain A. Improving survival in decompensated cirrhosis. Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:318627. doi:10.1155/2012/318627

55. Cleveland Clinic. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cleveland Clinic website. Published November 17, 2021. Accessed November 15, 2025. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21709-hepatocellular-carcinoma-hccrcinoma-hcc

56. Zeuzen S, Foster GR, Wang S, et al. Glecaprevir–pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV genotype 1 or 3 infection. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):354-369. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1702417

57. Kuncio DE, Newbern EC, Fernandez-Viña MH, Herdman B, Johnson CC, Viner KM. Comparison of risk-based hepatitis C screening and the true seroprevalence in an urban prison system. J Urban Health. 2015;92(2):379-386. doi:10.1007/s11524-015-9945-4

58. Lyons MS, Lindsell CJ, Ruffner AH, et al. Randomized comparison of universal and targeted HIV screening in the emergency department. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;64(3):315-323. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a21611

59. Eckman MH, Reed JL, Trent M, Goyal MK. Cost-effectiveness of Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening for Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Emergency Department. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(1):81-89. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3571

60. McWhirter L, Lou Y, Reingold S, et al. Rates of Appropriate Treatment and Follow-Up Testing After a Gonorrhea and/or Chlamydia Infection in an Urban Network of Federally Qualified Health Center Systems. Sex Transm Dis. 2022;49(5):319-324. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001600

61. Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Hoover KW, Gift TL. Cost-Effectiveness of Opt-Out Chlamydia Testing for High-Risk Young Women in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(2):216-224. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.007

62. Gupta P, Fairley CK, Chen MY, et al. Increased syphilis testing and detection of late latent syphilis among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategy in an urban Australian sexual health clinic: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023;40:100875. Published 2023 Aug 7. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100875

63. Soh QR, Oh LYJ, Chow EPF, Johnson CC, Jamil MS, Ong JJ. HIV Testing Uptake According to Opt-In, Opt-Out or Risk-Based Testing Approaches: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022;19(5):375-383. doi:10.1007/s11904-022-00614-0

64. Neumann PJ, Kim DD. Cost-effectiveness thresholds used by study authors, 1990-2021. JAMA. 2023;329(15):1312-1314. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1792.

65. Assoumou SA, Tasillo A, Vellozzi C, et al. Cost-effectiveness and Budgetary Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Treatment, and Linkage to Care in US Prisons. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(7):1388-1396. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz383

66. Eisenstein LG, Fisher J, Simon L, Tobey M. Challenges and Opportunities for Patients Released from Correctional Facilities: a Qualitative Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1328-1329. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05216-y

67. Haukoos J, Hopkins E, Campbell JD, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;84(3):234-243. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.009

68. Haukoos JS, Campbell JD, Conroy AA, et al. Programmatic cost evaluation of nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81565. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081565

69. D’Arminio Monforte A, d’Ettorre G, Galardo G, Lani E, Kagenaar E, Huntington S, Jarrett J, Ruf M, Ricciardi W. Estimating the potential health economic value of introducing universal opt-out testing for HIV in emergency departments in Italy. Eur J Public Health. 2025;35(5):999-1006. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf057

70. Wurcel AG, London K, Crable EL, et al. Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy and Infectious Diseases Care for Justice-Involved Populations. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2024;30(13):94-99. doi:10.3201/eid3013.230742