Revisiting Faricimab and Earlier Randomized Controlled Trials for Diabetic Macular Edema in Light of Newly Defined Pathogeneses

Main Article Content

Avinoam Ophir, MD

Abstract

The primary aim of therapy for center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME) is to achieve a long-lasting dry macula. High therapeutic efficacy correlates with targeting the underlying pathogenesis. Recent discoveries have identified two additional tractional pathogeneses that are undetectable by standard optical coherence tomography (OCT). These indicated that all “diffuse” DME in non-ischemic maculae is tractional in origin. Consequently, DME may be classified by pathogenesis as tractional DME and microaneurysm-related DME.


Faricimab (Vabysmo) inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2, and is highly effective in abolishing leaking microaneurysms, altering their turnover. In the pivotal YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, two outcome assessments were reported. The first applied a numerical definition in which central subfield thickness <325µm was considered “no DME” ("dry" macula), irrespective of OCT anatomy. Using <325µm and visual criteria, injection intervals were extended to 12 and 16 weeks, and <325µm was found in ~83% of eyes over the 2-year trial. The second assessment was anatomical: at year-1 and -2, approximately half, ~40% and 47%, respectively, achieved ≥8 weeks of dry, fluid-free maculae. Hence, injection intervals were extended in 43% (83%-40%) and 36% of eyes, respectively, with edematous maculae, instead of prompt treatment.


Uniquely, analysis revealed a sharp clinical separation between two response patterns: (1) anatomical drying for ≥8 weeks, consistent with faricimab’s effect in microaneurysm-related DME, and (2) partial or absent response, consistent with tractional DME. Had DME been stratified before treatment and faricimab used only for microaneurysm-related disease, dryness could likely have been achieved for ≥8 weeks, while futile injections could have been avoided in tractional DME. Concerns regarding outcomes following missed stratification might also be relevant, in retrospect, to most earlier trials and real-world practice.


In conclusion, the well-defined clinical separation between the two DME pathogeneses supports identical earlier claims, and seems a landmark moment for DME therapy after decades. It follows the conduct: Never mix two different items for calculations. After excluding microaneurysm-related DME, the benchmarks for long-lasting resolution remain pars plana vitrectomy in treatment-naïve eyes or following failed grid laser photocoagulation; grid laser photocoagulation is efficacious in specific early conditions. Aligning future trials and clinical practice with pathogenetic enrollment, consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki, and anatomy-based endpoints is essential to move toward an effective, potentially curative therapy.

Keywords: Dry diabetic macular edema, Curative DME, Faricimab, Microaneurysm-related DME, Tractional DME, Diffuse DME, Focal DME, DME pathogenesis, DME classifications, Extrafoveal traction, 3D-OCT, Transitional-phase DME, Anti-VEGF

Article Details

How to Cite
OPHIR, Avinoam. Revisiting Faricimab and Earlier Randomized Controlled Trials for Diabetic Macular Edema in Light of Newly Defined Pathogeneses. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 2, feb. 2026. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7210>. Date accessed: 02 mar. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v14i2.7210.
Section
Editorial

References

1. Sadda SR, Campbell J, Dugel PU, Holekamp NM, Kiss S, Loewenstein A, et al. Relationship between duration and extent of edema and visual acuity outcome with ranibiz µm ab in diabetic macular edema: A post hoc analysis of Protocol I data. Eye (Lond) 2020;34(3):480-490.doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0522-z.
2. Sakamoto A, Nishijima K, Kita M, Oh H, Tsujikawa A, Yoshimura N. Association between foveal photoreceptor status and visual acuity after resolution of diabetic macular edema by pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(10):1325-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1107-5.
3. Cennamo G, Montorio D, Fossataro F, Fossataro C, Tranfa F. Evaluation of vessel density in disorganization of retinal inner layers after resolved diabetic macular edema using optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244789.
4. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Garcia-Arumi J, Bandello F, Berg K, Chakravarthy U, Gerenda BS, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA). Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4):185-222. doi: 10.1159/000458539.
5. Wykoff CC, Abreu F, Adamis AP, Basu K, Eichenba µm DA, Haskova Z, et al. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): two randomized, double-masked, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10326);741-755. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00018-6.
6. Wong TY, Haskova Z, Asik K, Ba µm al CR, Csaky KG, Eter N, et al. Faricimab treat-and-extend for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-year results from the randomized phase 3 YOSEMITE and RHINE trials. Ophthalmology. 2024;131(6):708-723. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.026.
7. Ferro Desideri L, Traverso CE, Nicolò M. The emerging role of the Angiopoietin-Tie pathway as therapeutic target for treating retinal diseases. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2022;26(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/ 14728222.2022.2036121.
8. Heier JS, Singh RP, Wykoff CC, Csaky KG, Lai TYY, Loewenstein A, et al. The angiopoietin/tie pathway in retinal vascular diseases: A Review. Retina. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003003.
9. Takamura Y, Yamada Y, Morioka M, Gozawa M, Mats µm ura T, Inatani M. Turnover of microaneurysms after intravitreal injections of faricimab for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Oct 3;64(13):31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.31.
10. Takamura, Y, Yamada, Y, Inatani, M. Role of microaneurysms in the pathogenesis and therapy of diabetic macular edema: A descriptive review. Medicina 2023,59, 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030435
11. The DRCR.net, Elman MJ, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1064-1077. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031.
12. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, et al. The RESTORE Study: Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4): 615-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.031.
13. DRCR.net; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. New Eng J Med. 2015;372(13):1193-1203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264.
14. Bressler SB, Barve A, Ganapathi PC, Beckmann K, Apte RS, Marcus DM, et al. Aflibercept biosimilar MYL-1701P vs. reference aflibercept in diabetic macular edema: The INSIGHT randomized clinical trial. Jama Ophthalmol. 2024:142(10):952-960. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3458.
15. Gillies MC, McAllister IL, Zhu M, Wong W, Louis D, Arnold JJ, Wong TY. Intravitreal triamcinolone prior to laser treatment of diabetic macular edema: 24-month results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 2011;118:866-872. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029.
16. Glassman AR, Wells III JA, Josic K, Maguire MG, Antoszyk AN, Baker C, et al. Five-year outcomes after initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema (Protocol T Extension Study). Ophthalmology. 2020;127(9): 1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.021.
17. Jhaveri CD, Glassman AR, Ferris FL 3rd, Liu D, Maguire MG, Allen JB, et al. Aflibercept monotherapy or bevacizumab first for diabetic macular edema. New Engl J Med. 2022; 387(8):692-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204225.
18. Sensoy E, Citirik M. Current biosimilar anti-VEGF drugs in retinal diseases. Eur Eye Res. 2024;4(3):237-244 | doi: 10.14744/eer.2024.29291.
19. Blindbaek SL, Peto T, Grauslund J. Aflibercept and navigated versus conventional laser in diabetic macular oedema: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;98(4):347-352. doi: 10.1111/aos.14266. Epub 2019 Oct 10. PMID: 31602811.
20. Zhang J, Wang M, Chen L, Radke N. Diabetic blindness remains a big challenge despite all recent advancements in diagnostics and treatments. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2024;13(5):100105. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo/2024/100105.
21. Ophir A, Martinez MR, Mosqueda P, Trevino A. Vitreous traction and epiretinal membranes in diabetic macular edema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Eye (London). 2010;24(10):1545-1553. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.80.
22. Ophir A, Trevino A, Fatum S. Extrafoveal vitreous traction associated with diabetic diffuse macular oedema. Eye (Lond). 2010;24(2):347-353. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.106.
23. Karatas M, Ramirez JA, Ophir A. Diabetic vitreopapillary traction and macular edema. Eye (London). 2005;19(6):676-682. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701622.
24. Ophir A, Martinez MR. Epiretinal membranes and incomplete posterior vitreous detachment in diabetic macular edema, detected by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(9):6414-6420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6781.
25. Ophir A. Full-field 3-D optical coherence tomography imaging and treatment decision in diffuse diabetic macular edema. Letter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(5):3052-3053. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14414.
26. Adhi M, Badaro E, Liu JJ, Kraus MF, Ba µm al CR, Witkin AJ, et al. Three-dimensional enhanced imaging of vitreoretinal interface in diabetic retinopathy using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;162:140-149.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.025.
27. Fatima N, Islam QU, Shafique M. Frequency of vitreomacular traction in diabetic macular edema on optical coherence tomography. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2017;67(1):47-50. ISSN 0030-9648.
28. Ophir A, Hanna R, Martinez MR. Importance of 3-D image reconstruction of spectral-domain OCT on outcome of grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(6):836-843. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.17.
29. Ophir A. Re: Mylonas G, et al. The impact of the vitreomacular interface on functional and anatomical outcomes in diabetic macular edema treated with three different anti-VEGF agents: Post hoc analysis of the protocol T study. Correspondence. Retina. 2023;43(7):e39-41. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003803.
30. Gandorfer A, Rohleder M, Grosselfinger S, Haritoglou C, Ulbig M, Kampik A. Epiretinal pathology of diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with vitreomacular traction. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:638–652.
31. Hagenau F, Vogt D, Ziada J, Guenther S, Haritoglou, Wolf A, et al. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: Optical coherence tomography criteria and pathology of the vitreomacular interface. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;200:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.004.
32. Jones CH, Gui W, Schumann RG, Boneva S, Lange CA, van Overdam K, et al. Hyalocytes in proliferative vitreoretinal diseases. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2022;17(4):263-280. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2022.2100764.
33. Ophir A. Long-lasting, pathogeneses-related drying of diabetic macular edema. European Soc Med. Med Res Arch. 2024:12(11). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i11.0000.
34. Lewis H, Abrams GW, Blumenkranz MS, Campo RV. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular traction and edema associated with posterior hyaloidal traction. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(5):753-759. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31901-3.
35. Pendergast SD, Hassan TS, Williams GA, Cox MS, Margherio RR, Ferrone PJ, et al. Vitrectomy for diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with a taut premacular posterior hyaloid. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(2):178-186. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00472-4.
36. Ophir A. Achieving durable dry macula in diffuse diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis. Acta Sci Ophthalmol. 2021;4.3:91-104. https://actascientific.com > ASOP-04-0225.42.
37. La Haij EC, Hendrikse F, Kessels AGH, Derhaag PJ. Vitrectomy results in diabetic macular edema without evident vitreomacular traction. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239(4):264-270. doi: 10.1007/s004170000251.
38. Yanyali A, Nohutcu AF, Horozoglu F, Celik E. Modified grid laser photocoagulation versus pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(5):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.017.
39. Iglicki M, Lavaque A, Ozimek M, Negri HP, Okada M, Chhablani J, et al. Biomarkers and predictors for functional and anatomic outcomes for small gauge pars plana vitrectomy and peeling of the internal limiting membrane in naïve diabetic macular edema: The VITAL Study. PloS One. 2018:13(7):e0200365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200365.
40. Michalewska Z, Stewart MW, Landers III MB, Bednarski M, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Vitrectomy in the management of diabetic macular edema in treatment-naïve patients. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(4):402-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.10.011.
41. Yanyali A, Horozoglu F, Celik E, Ercalik Y, Nohutcu A. Pars plana vitrectomy and removal of the internal limiting membrane in diabetic macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16(4):573-581. doi:10.1177/112067210601600412.
42. Tachi N, Ogino N. Vitrectomy for diffuse macular edema in cases of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122(2):258-260. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72018-5.
43. Browning DJ, Lee C, Stewart MW, Landers MB 3rd. Vitrectomy for center-involved diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr 26;10:735-742. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S104906.
44. Maguire MJ, Laidlaw A, Hammond C, Muqit MMH, Still D, Dinah C, et al. Vitrectomy as an adjunct to treat-and-extend anti-VEGF injections for diabetic macular edema: The vitrectomy in diabetic macular oedema (VIDEO) randomized clinical trial. Jama Ophthalmol. 2024;142;(9):837-844. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2777.
45. Kakihara S, Zhuang K, Busza A, Fawzi AA. Macular Microaneurysms are associated with chronic kidney disease and deep capillary plexus ischemia in referable diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Dec 1;66(15):3. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.15.3.
46. Stefansson E, Landers, MB 3rd,Wolbarst ML. Increased retinal oxygen supply following pan-retinal photocoagulation and vitrectomy and lensectomy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1981;79:307-334. PMID: 7200671; PMCID: PMC1312190.
47. Kumagai K, Horie E, Fukami M, Mariko Furukawa M. Ten-year follow-up of visual outcomes after vitrectomy for clinically non-tractional diabetic macular edema. Cureus 2025;17(10):e95537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.95537.
48. Browning DJ, Altaweel MM, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Scott IU. Diabetic macular edema: What is focal and what is diffuse? Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(5):649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.013.
49. Gabrielle PH, Nguyen V, Creuzot-Garcher C, Arnold JJ, Mehta H, Duran MA, et al. Three-year treatment outcomes of aflibercept versus ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. Retina. 2022;42(6):1085-1094. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003428.
50. Kuo BL, Tabano D, Garmo V, PharmD EK, Leng T, Meghan Hatfield M, et al. Long-term treatment patterns for diabetic macular edema up to 6-year follow-up in the IRIS Registry. Ophthalmology Retina 2024;8:1074-1082. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
51. Ciulla TA, Hussain RM, Taraborelli D, Pollack JS, Williams DF. Longer-Term Anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and vein occlusion-related macular edema: Clinical outcomes in 130,247 Eyes. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 ;6(9):796-806. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.021.
52. Yoon D, Rusu I, Barbazetto I. Reduced effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents on diabetics with vitreomacular interface abnormalities. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34(4):817-823. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9884-6.
53. Wong Y, Steel DHW, Habib MS, Stubbing-Moore A, Bajwa D, Avery PJ, et al. Vitreoretinal interface abnormalities in patients treated with ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016(12);255(4):733–742. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3562-0.
54. Fu DJ, Amit V, Mishra AV, Quek C, Balaskas K, Pontikos N, et al. Visual and anatomical failure of anti-VEGF therapy for retinal vascular diseases: a survival analysis of real-world data. Eye 2025;39:977–985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03529-9
55. Rush RB. One year results of faricimab for aflibercept-resistant diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol 2023;17:2397-2403. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S424314.
56. El-Badawi K, Scrivens B, Eke O, Ismail R, Kobayter L, Savatore S. Twelve-month outcomes of faricimab for patients with sub-optimally responsive diabetic macular oedema: A retrospective single-centre study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19(5):1583–1591. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03529-9.
57. Galindo AM, Ohayon A, Hod K, Levine MF, Geffen N, Shulman S. Real-world evidence of long-term durability and efficacy of faricimab as an advanced treatment line for NVAMD and DME. Int Ophthalmol. 2026;46(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03902-x.
58. Sheth VS, Schlottmann P, Lai TYY, Abreu F, Chang A, Eter N, et al. Four-year outcomes of Faricimab in diabetic macular edema: Results from the RHONE-X extension trial. Ophthalmology 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.01.001.
59. Brown DM, Boyer DS, Do DV, Wykoff CC, Sakamoto T, Peter Win P, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in diabetic macular oedema (PHOTON): 48-week results from a randomized, double masked non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet 2024;403:1153–1163. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.10.028.
60. Sam-Oyerinde OA, Patel PJ. Real-world outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular oedema: barriers to treatment success and implications for low/lower-middle-income countries. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12(12):809-826. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00672-6.