Assessment and Training of Central Facial Palsy Following Stroke: Results from a Nation-Wide Danish Survey
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background/Objective: Central facial palsy is common following stroke. Although spontaneous alleviation is seen among some individuals, there are still a large proportion who suffer long-lasting consequences. The objective of this study was to investigate the current practice for assessment and training of individuals with central facial palsy in Denmark and thus shed light on potential focus areas for research.
Methods: A national survey among Danish occupational therapists, who according to Danish practice, are responsible for management of central facial palsy. The survey was distributed to members of two professional nation-wide societies.
Results: A total of 211 occupational therapists who worked with central facial palsy completed the survey. The median age was 45, and 52% had >15 years of experience. A total of 59% worked in the municipalities, 37% worked in public hospitals, and 4% worked in private practice. In assessment of central facial palsy, 86% used Facial Oral Tract Therapy, 46% used subjective evaluations concomitantly, while the House-Brackmann and Sunnybrook scales were rarely used. The most common training methods were mimical exercises, which was used by 88% of responders, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation and Kinesio taping were used by 57% and 55% respectively.
Conclusion: Findings showed that current practice for management of central facial palsy lack validated scales, with possibilities for tracking progress. Furthermore, training methods lack scientific evidence, which is a warranted focus area for research. Results are likely generalizable to other countries, since the lack of validated assessment tools and evidence-based training protocols are a global concern.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Hotton M, Huggons E, Hamlet C, et al. The psychosocial impact of facial palsy: A systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(3):695-727.
3. Pouwels S, Beurskens CHG, Kleiss IJ, Ingels KJAO. Assessing psychological distress in patients with facial paralysis using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(8):1066-1071.
4. Konecny P, Elfmark M, Urbanek K. Facial paresis after stroke and its impact on patients’ facial movement and mental status. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(1):73-75.
5. Dominika Dulak, Imama A. Naqvi. Neuroanatomy, Cranial Nerve 7 (Facial). NationalLibraryofMedicine. July 2023.
6. Wongwandee M, Hongdusit K. Analysis of Upper Facial Weakness in Central Facial Palsy Following Acute Ischemic Stroke. Neurol Int. 2025;17(1). doi:10.3390/neurolint17010012
7. Fabricius J, Kothari SF, Kothari M. Assessment and rehabilitation interventions for central facial palsy in patients with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2021;35(5):511-519.
8. Eroglu HS, Bowen A, Checketts M, Mitchell C. Managing Facial Palsy After Stroke: Results From an Online Survey of Health Professionals. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025;60(5). doi:10.1111/1460-6984.70127
9. Geschwind N. The Organization of Language and the Brain. Science (1979). 1970;170(3961):940-944. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3961.940.
10. Krumhuber EG, Skora LI, Hill HCH, Lander K. The role of facial movements in emotion recognition. Nature Reviews Psychology. 2023;2(5):283-296. doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00172-1
11. Konecny P, Elfmark M, Horak S, et al. Central facial paresis and its impact on mimicry, psyche and quality of life in patients after stroke. Biomedical Papers. 2014;158(1):133-137. doi:10.5507/bp.2013.014
12. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98-e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
13. Alt Murphy M, Munoz-Novoa M, Heremans C, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on motor rehabilitation. Eur Stroke J. 2025;10(4):1160-1188. doi:10.1177/23969873251338142
14. Vaughan A, Gardner D, Miles A, Copley A, Wenke R, Coulson S. A systematic review of physical rehabilitation of facial palsy. Front Neurol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00222
15. Müller D, Meyer-Königsbüscher J. Eating and Drinking – Involves More Than Swallowing. In: Nusser-Müller-Busch R, Gampp Lehmann K, eds. Facial-Oral Tract Therapy (F.O.T.T.): For Eating, Swallowing, Nonverbal Communication and Speech. Springer; 2021:73-114. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51637-6
16. Hägg M, Morris NR. Introducing IQoro: A Clinically Effective Oral Neuromuscular Treatment for Dysphagia. Dysphagia - New Advances. 2021. doi:10.5772/intechopen.101144
17. Castillo-Morales R. Die Orofaziale Regulationstherapie. München: Pflaum Verlag; 1998.
18. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1985;93(2):146-147. doi:10.1177/019459988509300202
19. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a Sensitive Clinical Facial Grading System. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 1996;114(3):380-386. doi:10.1016/s0194-59989670206-1
20. Guarin DL, Yunusova Y, Taati B, et al. Toward an Automatic System for Computer-Aided Assessment in Facial Palsy. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22(1):42-49.
21. Yoo MC, Kim JH, Kim YJ, et al. Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Facial Paralysis Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury: A Review on Preclinical and Clinical Studies. J Clin Med. 2023;12(12). doi:10.3390/jcm12124133
22. Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen E, Van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987