↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Objective: Antenatal consultations (AC) are an opportunity to provide anticipatory guidance about preterm birth to parents and facilitate their involvement in healthcare decisions. Literature shows that contextualization and eliciting family beliefs and values is essential, but there is limited discussion about how acknowledging those beliefs and values by clinicians is perceived by parents in AC. The research question is: (How) does the integration of family context (FC), beliefs and values shape patient experience of antenatal counselling? Study Design: This is an exploratory secondary analysis of interviews with eleven parents. A flexible coding strategy was used with a thematic analysis that drew on some methods from grounded theory. Results: Three themes comprising the parental experience of the prematurity antenatal consultation were identified. Parental experiences begin with a whirlwind of unknown, wherein parents feel caught in unanticipated, unknown frenzy of potentially delivering prematurely. Parents rationalized the need for this overwhelming but necessary discussion, but at times question how it was approached. Finally, they used two core methods to cope with this uncertainty; hope and human connection, both rooted in clinician integration of their FC, beliefs and values. Conclusion: This study reinforces the necessity of acknowledging and addressing parental needs identified by understanding their context, beliefs and values, regardless of gestational age or perceived medical complexity by the healthcare professional.
↓ Read PDF
02 · OJS METADATA

Keywords

antenatal consultationsprematurityparental perspectivesfamily contextcontextualization of care
03 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 14 No 3 (2026): Vol.14, Issue 3, March 2026
SectionResearch Articles
Published01 April 2026
DOI10.18103/mra.v14i3.7370
ISSN2375-1924
04 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

MD

Maya Dahan

Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, DAN Women & Babies Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario

PC

Paige Church

Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts and Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston Massachusetts

KO

Karel O'Brien

Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario

LR

Leahora Rotteau

Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Ontario and Institute for Healthcare Policy, Management and Evaluation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto

JM

Jack Maypole

The Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗