Psychobiological Analysis of Social Surrogacy, Minority Stress and Parasocial Relationships: A Narrative Review

Main Article Content

Maria Carolina Pinotti Leite Márcia Helena da Silva Melo

Abstract

Human sociality is a fundamental homeostatic requirement rooted in evolutionary fitness. For marginalized populations, institutionalized exclusion and systemic discrimination trigger "minority stress," a distinct and chronic allostatic load that drives a biological burden known as "weathering". This sustained physiological strain penetrates the architecture of cellular life, manifesting through neuroendocrine dysregulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines like Interleukin-6, and accelerated biological aging marked by Leukocyte Telomere Length attrition. This narrative review proposes an integrative synthesis across social psychology, evolutionary biology, and molecular endocrinology to evaluate the Social Surrogacy Hypothesis as a temporary mechanism to mitigate these weathering effects. The methodological framework synthesizes three core pillars (psychological shielding, concept inhibition, and biological markers of aging) while maintaining a strict taxonomy between episodic Parasocial Interactions and enduring Parasocial Relationships. The synthesis demonstrates that, engagement with favored media, where long-term relationships are established, may act as a psychological placeholder or "social snack". Recalling a favored surrogate can induce concept inhibition, quieting the internal "exclusion alarm". This cognitive shielding triggers a theoretical downregulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, reducing the circulation of neurotoxic glucocorticoids and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Consequently, parasocial relationships offer a temporary biological reprieve that may preserve somatic cell integrity and mitigate premature cellular senescence. However, social surrogacy remains a temporary placeholder rather than a structural solution to discrimination, and direct empirical investigation is required to fully validate this proposed psychobiological pathway.

Article Details

How to Cite
LEITE, Maria Carolina Pinotti; DA SILVA MELO, Márcia Helena. Psychobiological Analysis of Social Surrogacy, Minority Stress and Parasocial Relationships: A Narrative Review. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 6, june 2026. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7456>. Date accessed: 02 july 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v14i6.7456.
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Derrick JL, Gabriel S, Hugenberg K. Social surrogacy: how favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(2):352-362. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003
2. Gabriel S, Valenti J, Young AF. Social surrogates, social motivations, and everyday activities: the case for a strong, subtle, and sneaky social self. In: Olson JM, Zanna MP, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 53. Academic Press; 2016:189-243.
3. Salomaa AC, Livingston NA, Bryant WT, et al. A bottom-up approach to developing a unified trauma-minority stress model for transgender and gender diverse people. Psychol Trauma. 2023;15(4):618-627. doi:10.1037/tra0001373
4. Galatzer-Levy IR, Huang SH, Bonanno GA. Trajectories of resilience and dysfunction following potential trauma: a review and statistical evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;63:41-55. doi:10.1016/j.cpr. 2018.05.008
5. Mello MF, Faria AA, Mello AF, Carpenter LL, Tyrka AR, Price LH. Maus-tratos na infância e psicopatologia no adulto: caminhos para a disfunção do eixo hipotálamo-pituitária-adrenal. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2009;31(Supl II):S13-S18.
6. Marchette RCN. Resiliência e vulnerabilidade ao estresse social e suas implicações neurobiológicas [tese]. Florianópolis, SC: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2017.
7. Krämer NC, Lucas G, Schmitt L, Gratch J. Social cues in human-computer interaction: Influence of agent’s social category and user’s isolation on social responses and belongingness. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2018;109:112-121. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.09.001
8. Coelho VC, Oliveira MER. Estresse e Ansiedade: Mecanismos Neurobiológicos, Exaustão Adrenal e Implicações Clínicas. In: Bem-estar e Qualidade de Vida: Prevenção, Intervenção e Inovações. Vol 8. Capítulo 07.
9. Sousa LH. Isolamento social, estresse e memória: os impactos da pandemia de COVID-19 no cérebro adulto [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso]. Teresina, PI: Universidade Estadual do Piauí; 2024.
10. Schäfer K, Eerola T. How listening to music and engagement with other media provide a sense of belonging: An exploratory study. Music Sci. 2018;1:1-15. doi:10.1177/2059204318764506
11. Koutsogeorgou E, Chiesi AM, Leonardi M. Social capital components and social support of persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2018. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(21):2251-2264. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1597182
12. Chan SH, Poon KT. Live stream social surrogacy and its consequences. Psychology of Popular Media. Published online December 2, 2024. doi:10.1037/ppm0000570
13. Pinker S. How the Mind Works. WW Norton & Company; 1997.
14. Hartmann T. Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In: Reinecke L, Oliver MB, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being. Routledge; 2017:131-144.
15. Schiappa E, Gregg PB, Hewes DE. The parasocial contact hypothesis. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(1):92-115. doi:10.1080/0363775052000342544
16. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5:374-381.
17. Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(6):463-475.
18. McEwen BS. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583(2-3):174-185. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.071
19. Silva EC. Efeitos do estresse crônico em áreas do cérebro. Rev Eletr Estácio Recife. 2015;1(1).
20. Graeff FG. Ansiedade, medo e pânico. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2007;29(Supl I):S3-S11.
21. Araldi-Favassa CT, Armiliato N, Kalinine I. Aspectos fisiológicos e psicológicos do estresse. Rev Psicol UnC. 2005;2(2):84-92.
22. Mello AF, Juruena MF, Pariante CM, et al. Eixo hipotálamo-pituitária-adrenal, função dos receptores de glicocorticóides e sua importância na depressão. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2007;29(Supl I):S27-S34.
23. Mijas M, Blukacz M, Koziara K, et al. Dysregulated by stigma: Cortisol responses to repeated psychosocial stress in gay and heterosexual men. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021;131:105325. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105325
24. Flentje A, Heck NC, Brennan JM, Meyer IH. The relationship between minority stress and biological outcomes: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2020;43(5):673-694. doi:10.1007/s10865-019-00120-6
25. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674-697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
26. Livingston NA. Trauma, minority stress, and disproportionate health burden among LGBTQ+ people. PTSD Res Q. 2023;34(4).
27. Chae DH, Nuru-Jeter AM, Adler NE, et al. Discrimination, racial bias, and telomere length in African-American men. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):103-111. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.020
28. Castro GD, Susin C, Vettore MV, et al. Estresse e doença periodontal. R Fac Odontol Porto Alegre. 2002;43(2):52-59.
29. Paveltchuk FO, Borsa JC. A teoria do estresse de minoria em lésbicas, gays e bissexuais. Rev SPAGESP. 2020;21(2):52-65.
30. Gardner WL, Pickett CL, Knowles ML. Social snacking and shielding: using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In: Williams KD, Forgas JP, von Hippel W, eds. The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. Psychology Press; 2005:227-242.
31. Bond BJ. Parasocial relationships with media personae: why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychol. 2018;21(3):457-485. doi:10.1080/15213269.2017.1416295
32. Jarzyna C. Parasocial interaction, the COVID-19 quarantine, and digital age media. Hum Arena. 2021;4:231–245. doi:10.1007/s42087-020-00129-z
33. Djalovski A, Kinreich S, Zagoory-Sharon O, Feldman R. Social dialogue triggers biobehavioral synchrony of partners' endocrine response via sex-specific, hormone-specific, attachment-specific mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12421. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91626-0
34. Mula-Márquez Y, Nava-Arquillo B, Matías-García JA. Parasocial relationships and identification with fictional characters in adolescents and adults: a systematic review. Psychology Research. 2024.
35. Leite FP, Baptista PP. The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: the role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. J Mark Theory Pract. 2022;30(3):295-311. doi:10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275
36. Sippel LM, Pietrzak RH, Charney DS, Mayes LC, Southwick SM. Oxytocin and stress-related disorders: neurobiological mechanisms and treatment opportunities. Chronic Stress. 2017;1. doi:10.1177/ 2470547016687996
37. Miller E. The relationships between binge-watching behavior, content familiarity, depression, and anxiety. Master's thesis. Lipscomb University; 2024. Carolyn Wilson Digital Collections. https://digitalcollections.lipscomb.edu/psy_graduate/4
38. Miyawaki CE. Association of social isolation and health across different racial and ethnic groups of older Americans. Ageing Soc. 2015;35(10):2210-2228.
39. Schneider E, Hopf D, Ditzen B, et al. Affectionate touch and diurnal oxytocin levels: An ecological momentary assessment study. eLife. 2023;12:e81241. doi:10.7554/eLife.81241