01 · ABSTRACT
Abstract
This article focuses on three elements. First, it establishes a contrast between the notion of relational ethics used in the field of healthcare and the notion of relational ethics proposed decades earlier by Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, one of the pioneers of family therapy and the founder of contextual therapy. In the general field of health care, relational ethics apply to the relationship between professionals and the persons they treat. In contextual therapy, relational ethics become a guiding principle in close and family relationships. Second, it presents the relational consequences of injustices, especially on parent-child relationships. Third, it discusses mental illnesses as a source of injustices, a view that is unique in the field of mental health and offers a new perspective on possible interventions that are not limited to family therapy but could inspire any health professional. While this article is based on the empirical findings of the founder of contextual therapy and later practitioners of the approach, including the author, a child and adult psychiatrist with a long clinical experience, it describes some recent attempts to validate these findings through formal research.
↓ Read PDF02 · OJS METADATA
Keywords
Contextual therapyrelational ethicsrelational injusticessituational injusticesdestructive entitlementparentificationconstructive entitlementmultidirected partialitymental illnesses and parenting.
03 · PUBLICATION RECORD
Article details
JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 14 No 4 (2026): Vol.14 Issue 4 April 2026
SectionResearch Articles
Published01 May 2026
DOI10.18103/mra.v14i4.7458
ISSN2375-1924
04 · RIGHTS & REUSE
Rights & reuse
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.