↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Currently, the recently revised ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practices Guidance [1] provides no discussion pertaining to the bioanalysis of clinical trial samples. Furthermore, the harmonised published ICH M10 Bioanalytical Method Validation and Sample Analysis Guidance [2] does not refer to Good Clinical Practices (GCP) requirements and therefore the bioanalytical laboratory is left with a significant gap in guidance as to what expectations would be of the regulatory authorities associated with clinical samples in the event of an inspection. The European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) discussions pertaining to this gap, which have gone on for 15 years, also recognize the blurred lines between the GCP and GLP (Good Laboratory Practices) in the bioanalytical laboratory [3], and even during MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) inspections in the United Kingdom (UK). The aim of this editorial is to assess the potential regulatory gaps in the bioanalytical laboratory when analyzing clinical samples and provide insight into how the GCPs apply to clinical sample bioanalysis.
↓ Read PDF
02 · OJS METADATA

Keywords

ClinicalBioanalysisRegulatoryGCPICH E6(R3)ICH M10Fit-for-PurposeSponsor
03 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 14 No 4 (2026): Vol.14 Issue 4 April 2026
SectionEditorial
Published01 May 2026
DOI10.18103/mra.v14i4.7460
ISSN2375-1924
04 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

CT

Christopher Tudan

Veloxity Labs

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗