Better Health Care Outcomes in Unprecedented Times: A Review of Conceptual Frameworks to Aid Understanding and Decision-Making

Main Article Content

Frank K Fair Daniel Fasko Joanna Fair

Abstract

This article presents readers an overview of three recently articulated conceptual frameworks for (1) intelligence, (2), moral development in ethical decision-making, and (3) practical wisdom with the aim of giving useful guidance for understanding and improving health care decision-making. The first framework conception is the notion of “learnable intelligence,” how we acquire “mindware,” ways of thinking that are analogous to software subroutines on a computer. Sometimes, however, important mindware is missing or malfunctioning, and this prevents wise decision-making and requires that the relevant mindware be repaired or installed. The second framework concerns the development of moral rules and how the moral rules have the aim of reducing the harms we experience. A process for justifying the moral rules is provided, and this framework also includes permitting violations of those moral rules in exceptional circumstances by giving a decision guide for how to justify those violations. There is evidence presented that this framework comports with the psychology of moral development. The third framework examines a conceptualization of practical wisdom and presents examples of how it can be related to health care decision-making. Finally, we survey the global problem of widespread misinformation about science in general and health care in particular, such as misconceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy. We outline current efforts made to understand this phenomenon and to deal with the problems misinformation causes, in part by improving the mindware of decision makers. Finally, we discuss suggestions for further research and practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
K FAIR, Frank; FASKO, Daniel; FAIR, Joanna. Better Health Care Outcomes in Unprecedented Times: A Review of Conceptual Frameworks to Aid Understanding and Decision-Making. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 5, june 2026. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7555>. Date accessed: 23 june 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v14i5.7555.
Keywords
practical wisdom, decision making, misinformation, health care
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Adams J, Carmona R, Elders J, Murthy V, Novello A, Satcher D. Six surgeons general: It’s our duty to warn the nation about RFK Jr. Washington Post, Oct. 7, 2025 issue. Accessed April 14, 2026. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/10/07/surgeons-general-rfk-jr-robert-kennedy/
2. Califf R, von Eschenbach A, Friedman M, et al. A threat to evidence-based vaccine policy and public health security at the FDA. New England Journal of Medicine 2025, 394: 4-6.
3. Whitty C. Chief medical officer’s annual report 2025: Infections. Executive summary and recommendations. London, UK: Department of Health and Social Care; 2025. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69302a3a5b5198836f303fae/cmo-annual-report-2025-infections-executive-summary-and-recommendations.pdf
4. European Society of Medicine (ESMED). Policy framework: a new approach to addressing undervaccination in Europe. European Society of Medicine, 2024. Accessed April 15, 2026 at https://esmed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Policy-Framework-A-New-Approach-to-Addressing-Undervaccination-in-Europe.pdf
5. Heyes C. Cognitive gadgets. Harvard University Press; 2018.
6. Perkins D. Outsmarting IQ: the emerging science of learnable intelligence. The Free Press; 1995.
7. Stanovich K. What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. Yale University Press; 2010.
8. Gert B. The moral rules. Harper & Row; 1970.
9. Shtulman A. Learning to imagine. Harvard University Press; 2023.
10. Creane M. Deceptively fair: How critical thought, teacher engagement, and classroom policy choices impact moral reasoning among elementary students. In Fasko D, Fair F (Eds.)., Critical thinking in moral development: Philosophy, psychology, education, and assessment (pp. 163-184). l De Gruyter; 2025.
11. Kristjansson K, Fowers B. Phronesis: retrieving practical wisdom in psychology, philosophy, and education. Oxford University Press; 2024.
12. Norman A. Mental immunity: Infectious ideas, mind-parasites, and the search for a better way to think. Harper; 2021.
13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Understanding and addressing misinformation about science. National Academies Press; 2025. https://doi.org/10.17226/27894.
14. Eigenauer J. Mindware: critical thinking in everyday life. Journal of Intelligence. 12: 17; 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12020017.
15. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2013.
16. Gibbs J. Moral development and reality, 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.
17. Johnson R, Cureton A. Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2025. At https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
18. Subramani S, Biller-Andorno N. Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and Implications for clinical practice. Med Health Care Philos. 2022;25(3):351-360. doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10079-y
19. Gert B. Morality: its nature and justification, rev. ed. Oxford University Press; 2005.
20. Gert B, Culver C, Clouser K. Bioethics: A systematic approach, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
21. Haidt J. The righteous mind. Vintage Books; 2012.
22. Gray K. Outraged: why we fight about morality and politics and how to find common ground. Pantheon Books; 2025.
23. Harlow HF. The nature of love. American Psychologist,1958; 13(12): 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047884
24. Botero M. Observing primate caregivers. Springer Nature; 2025.
25. Yarlagadda H, Sandbulte J, Downs E. Challenges and enhancement of health: a dual impact of kangaroo care on parents and infants-systematic review. Mhealth. 2025 Jun 9;11:36. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-80. PMID: 40755941; PMCID: PMC12314710.
26. Cascio CJ, Moore D, McGlone F. Social touch and human development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019;35:5-11. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009
27. Tomasello M. The adaptive origins of uniquely human sociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2020; 375: 20190493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0493
28. Wagner PA, Johnson D, Fair F, Fasko D. Thinking ahead: engaging all teachers in critical thinking. Rowman & Littlefield; 2018.
29. Tuomela R. The philosophy of sociality: the shared point of view. Oxford University Press; 2007.
30. Chew SL. Challenging students’ core beliefs and values. In Landrum R, McCarthy M (Eds.), Teaching ethically: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 113-123). American Psychological Association; 2012.
31. Jacobsen J, Thomas J, Jackson V. Misunderstandings about prognosis: an approach for palliative care consultants when the patient does not seem to understand what was said. J of Palliative Medicine, 2013 Jan;16(1):91-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012. 0142. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
32. Sternberg RJ, Glück J. Wisdom: the psychology of wise thoughts, words, and deeds. Cambridge University Press; 2022.
33. McLoughlin S. Do we value what we think we value? assessing value clarity and moral blueprints. In Fasko D, Fair F. (Eds.), Critical thinking in moral development: philosophy, psychology, education, and assessment (pp. 264-286). De Gruyter; 2025.
34. Fair F, Fasko D. Intelligence and moral development: a critical historical review and future directions. Journal of Intelligence 2025; 13: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jintelligence13070072
35. Talbot S, Dean W. Physicians aren’t ‘burning out.’ They’re suffering from moral injury. STAT News 2018. At https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/26/physicians-not-burning-out-they-are-suffering-moral-injury/
36. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283(6):516-529. doi:10.1111/joim.12752
37. Bak-Coleman J, Alfano M, Barfuss W, et al. Stewardship of global collective behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021;118: e2025764118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118
38. Robertson CE, Del Rosario KS, Van Bavel JJ. Inside the funhouse mirror factory: How social media distorts perceptions of norms. Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101918. Epub 2024 Sep 26. PMID: 39369456.
39. Muirhead R, Rosenblum N. A lot of people are saying. Princeton University Press; 2019.
40. Caulfield M, Wineburg S. Verified. University of Chicago Press; 2023.
41. Hoepner J, Grant W. Wind turbine studies: how to sort the good, the bad, and the ugly. The Conversation 2015. Accessed April 15, 2025 at https://theconversation.com/wind-turbine-studies-how-to-sort-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-36548.
42. Oreskes N, Conway E. Merchants of doubt. Bloomsbury; 2011.
43. Osborne J, Pimentel D, Alberts B, et al. Science education in an age of misinformation. Stanford University; 2022. At: https://sciedandmisinfo.sites.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj25316/files/media/file/science_education_in_an_age_of_misinformation.pdf
44. Pearson H. Beyond belief: How evidence shows what really works. Princeton University Press; 2026.