↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

 

 

A quantitative questionnaire based study was carried out to assess how acceptable the various treatments for pelvic organ prolapse are to female obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees and consultants. Uptake for vaginal pessaries was low. Majority of respondents would accept conventional surgery for primary treatment and seem to be less keen to have vaginal mesh implants for surgery. This study highlights the complexity of decision making for treatment for prolapse even for group of women who are relatively verse with the subject. It is therefore absolute essential to have insight into how women perceive the acceptability of these treatments and their associated complications.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 5 No 1 (2017): Vol.5 Issue 1, January 2017
SectionResearch Articles
Published16 January 2017
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

VT

Veenu Tyagi

Subspeciality trainee urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Southern General Hospital 1345 Govan Road Glasgow G51 4TF [email protected] 0044 141 2012237

MP

Mahesh Perera

Consultant obstetrician and Gynaecologist, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Princes Royal Maternity Hospital 16 Alexandra Parade Glasgow G16 2ER 0044 211 5248

KG

Karen Lesley Guerrero

Consultant subspecialist Urogynaegologist NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Southern General Hospital 1345 Govan Road Glasgow G51 4TF 0044 141 2012237

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗