Achieving fundamental renal testing, foot care inspections and ophthalmology examinations through DSMT

Main Article Content

Juanita F Bridges

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of DSMT on achieving renal testing, foot care inspections and ophthalmology examinations among diabetic Veterans in an outpatient care clinic.

Material/Methods:  A cross sectional analysis of a representative sample of 550 adult Veterans with type 1 and type 2 diabetes was completed to assess the effect of receiving diabetes education via DSMT in a primary care setting on hemoglobin A1C (HgA1C), documented of renal testing, documented of an annual foot examination and documented of an annual ophthalmology examination.

Results:  The percentage lowering of HgA1C at the end of three months lowered to 7.5% compared to 9.2%. The number documented renal testing at the end of three months was 433, 78% compared to 244, 44%. The number of documented ophthalmologic examinations at the end of three months was 416, 76% compared to 231, 42%. The number reported foot examination at the end of three months performed at home by self or a family member was 442, 80%. The number of documented foot examination at the end of three months was 268, 49% compared 199, 36%.

Conclusions:  Conclusions are DSMT in a primary care setting improves Veterans diabetes care as indicated by a decrease mean HgA1C, increase in the  number of renal testing, increase in the number of ophthalmologic examinations, increase in reported and documented foot examinations.

Article Details

How to Cite
BRIDGES, Juanita F. Achieving fundamental renal testing, foot care inspections and ophthalmology examinations through DSMT. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, jan. 2017. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/952>. Date accessed: 18 apr. 2024.
Keywords
DSMT, hemoglobin A1C, renal testing, foot care inspections, ophthalmology examinations
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Leichter, S. Economic Considerations in the Application of Clinical Standards and Requirements in Diabetes Care. Clinical Diabetes. 2000;19:1-5
2. Kamel Boulos, M.N., Harvey, F.E., et.al. A proposed semantic framework for diabetes education content management, customization and delivery within the M2DM project. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2006;83:188-197. Elsevier.
3. Adolfsson, E.T., Walker-Engstrom, M., et.al. Patient education in type 2 diabetes. A randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2007;76:341-350. Elsevier.
4. Deakin, T.A., Cade, J.E., et. al. Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. Journal Compilation. 2006;23:944-954.Diabetes Medicine.
5. Sprague, M.A., Armstrong Shultz, J.A., Branen, L.J. Understanding Patient Experiences with Goal Setting for Diabetes Self-management after Diabetes Education. Family and Community Health. 2006;29:245-255.
6. Moskowitz, D., Thom, D.H., et.al. Peer Coaching to Improve Diabetes Self-Management: Which Patients Benefit Most? Journal General Internal Medicine. 2013;28:938-942.
7. Bridges, J.F.,Brignac, D., et.al. Optimizing HgA1C and glucose monitoring frequency in patients with type 2 diabetes. Medical Science Monitor. 2012;18:CR693-CR697.
8. Salinero-Fort, M., Santa Pau, E.C., et.al. Effectiveness of PRECEDE model for health education on changes and level of control of HgA1C, blood pressure, lipids, and body mass index in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BioMed Central Public Health. 2011;11:267.
9. Woodbury, M.G., Botros, M., et.al. Evaluation of a peer-led self-management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You. International Wound Journal ISSN. 2013;10:703-711.
10. Manjula, G.B., Premkumar, J. Effects of a Behavioral Intervention on Self-Efficacy, Self-Care Behavior and HgA1C Values among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Nursing Education. 2016;8:1-5.
11. Khanna, A., Bush, A.L., et.al. Hemoglobin A1c improvements and better diabetes-specific quality of life among participants completing diabetes self-management programs: a nested cohort study. BioMed Central Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012;10:48.
12. Beverly, E.A., Ganda, O.P., et.al. Do Older Adults Aged 60-75 Years Benefit from Diabetes Behavioral Interventions? Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1501-1506.
13. Rosai, M. C., Olendzki, B., et.al. Randomized Trial of a Literacy-Sensitive, Culturally Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Intervention for Low-Income Latinos. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:838-844.
14. Rasekaba, T.M., Graco, M., et.al. Impact of a Diabetes Diabetes Management Program on Diabetes Control and Patient Quality of Life. Population Health Management. 2012;15:12-19.
15. Nemcova, J., Hlinkova, E. The efficacy of diabetic foot care education. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2013;23:877-882.
16. Carter, E.L., Nunlee-Bland, G., Callender,C. A Patient-Centric, Provider Assisted Diabetes Telehealth Self-management Intervention for Urban Minorities. Perspectives in Health Information Management. 2011;2-11.
17. Tang, P.C., Overhage, J.M., et.al. Online disease management of diabetes: Engaging and Motivating Patients Online with Enhanced Resources-Diabetes (Empower-D), a randomized controlled trial. Journal American Medical Information Association. 2013;20:526-534.
18. American Diabetes Association. Fast Facts: Data and Statistics about diabetes. Professional.Diabetes.org/facts. Dec 2015