A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes with Fast Track Protocols for Colorectal Surgery in an Eastern Caribbean Nation

Main Article Content

Sahle P. Griffith Shamir O Cawich Alex Doyle Coutenay Chase Fatima Hefeji R Whitehead Solange S.K Ramkissoon Greg Padmore


Background: Fast track protocols (FTPs) have triggered considerable improvements in patients’ perioperative care and are accepted as the standardised approach to patient management in developed countries globally. Although the benefits of FTPs have been illustrated for some time, they are not universally used in developing countries. In the Eastern Caribbean, FTPs are implemented in an ad-hoc manner based on the attending surgeons.

Methods: We designed a comprehensive FTP modified for use in Barbados, an island nation in the Eastern Caribbean. After consensus, the FTPs were introduced into clinical practice at a tertiary referral public hospital. We prospectively evaluated clinical outcomes after introduction of FTP protocols for all patients undergoing colorectal operations from January 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. The study population was divided into three groups: Group I: full adherence (>16 FTP steps completed), Group II: partial adherence (10-15 FTP steps completed), Group III: non-adherence to FTP protocols (<9 FTP steps observed). In each group, we compared morbidity, mortality, return of bowel function, length of post-operative hospital stay and hospital readmission using SPSS version 20 for statistical analyses. 

Results: Over the study period, there were 27 colorectal operations performed. When the outcomes in group 1 and group 3 were compared, there was a statistically significant reduction in post-operative LOS (3 Vs 8.9 days; P<0.05) and overall morbidity (10% vs 50%; P 0.05) in the full FTP adherence groups.

Conclusions: In this Caribbean healthcare system, FTP implementation resulted in significant improvements in post-operative duration of hospitalization and overall morbidity. The main challenge is to achieve universal buy-in from health care providers in the Caribbean. We believe that the way to achieve this is continued medical education and targeted research to acquire local practice data from the Caribbean. We advocate the incorporation of FTP into colorectal surgical practice for Caribbean hospitals.   

Keywords: Caribbean, Colorectal, Cancer, Laparoscopic, Recovery, Protocols

Article Details

How to Cite
GRIFFITH, Sahle P. et al. A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes with Fast Track Protocols for Colorectal Surgery in an Eastern Caribbean Nation. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 11, nov. 2022. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/3323>. Date accessed: 13 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i11.3323.
Research Articles


1. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection, Clin Nutr. 2005; 24: 466-477.
2. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surg. 2011; 149(6): 830–840.
3. Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11(4): 344–353.
4. Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou YB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27(12): 1549–1554.
5. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Laparoscopy and/or fast track multimodal management vs standard care (LAFA) study group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006; 93(7): 800-9.
6. Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56; 667–678.
7. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010; 29: 434–440.
8. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24: 1119-1131.
9. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group, Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ. 2005; 330: 1420- 1421.
10. Griffith SP. Laparoscopic Colectomy: Oncologic Principles. J Carib Coll Surg. 2017; 1(S1): 20.
11. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 961–969.
12. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society for Perioperative Care. World J Surg. 2013; 37: 259-284.
13. Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B, et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; laparoscopy and/or fast track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg. 2006; 6: 16.
14. Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14: 88–95.
15. Cawich SO, Harding HE, Crandon IW, et al. Leadership in Surgery for Public Sector Hospitals in Jamaica: Strategies in the Operating Room. Perm J. 2013; 17(3): 121-125.
16. Cawich SO, Johnson PB, Dan D, Naraynsingh V. Surgical Leadership in the Time of Significant Generational Diversity. Surgeon: J Royal Coll Surg Ed. 2014; 12: 235-236.
17. Cawich SO, Johnson PB, Shah S, et al. Overcoming obstacles to establish a multidisciplinary team approach to hepatobiliary diseases: a working model in a Caribbean setting. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014; 28: 227-30.
18. De Alguilar-Nascimento JE, Dock-Nascimento DB. Reducing preoperative fasting time: A trend based on evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 2(3): 57-60.
19. Di Fronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX. Factors Affecting Early Postoperative Feeding Following Elective Open Colon Resection. Arch Surg. 1999; 134: 941.
20. Atkinson C, Monk VC, Ness AR, et al. Factors associated with early postoperative feeding: An observational study in a colorectal surgery population. Clin Nutrition ESPEN. 2020; 36: 99-105.
21. Nematihonar B, Yazdani A, Falahinejadghajari R, Mirkheshti A. Early postoperative oral feeding shortens first time of bowel evacuation and prevents long term hospital stay in patients undergoing elective small intestine anastomosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2019; 12(1): 25–30

Most read articles by the same author(s)