A histological analysis of bone regeneration assessing the effects of Open Wound Healing: A case series
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aim: To histologically study bone regeneration in cases of open wound healing
Material and method: In a case series of 20 patients, teeth which were fractured/ failed root canal which needed extraction and implant placement were included in the study. In all the cases, minimally invasive tooth extraction was done and care was taken not to damage either of the bony walls. Maxresorb bone graft (Botiss, Germany) was placed in the socket. A single layer of collagen membrane, Ossix plus membrane (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) was placed on the bone graft and 3-0 silk sutures were placed. After 5 months bone core was taken for histological analysis and Mis implant 3.75/11.5 implant was placed at the same site.
For histopathology, neutralized buffered formalin solution was used to fix the 2 mm trephine core biopsies and the soft tissue they overlaid right away, lasting between 24 and 48 hours. After which, the normal laboratory approach for tissue processing involving dehydration, cleaning, and paraffin wax infiltration was conducted for both the tissues. Hematoxylin and Eosin stains were used on sections that were 3 microns thick. Van Gieson, Massons trichrome and Picrosirus red were performed.
Results: soft tissue showed long thin rete ridges of parakeratinizd startified suamous epithelium and underlying dense collagenous stroma with few inflammatory cells chiefly lymphocytes. Bony tissue displayed well-formed regions of bony trabeculae with various mineralization phases.
Conclusion: open wound healing leads to bony regeneration as one can predict in closed healing.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Becker W, Becker BE. Flap designs for minimization of recession adjacent to maxillary anterior implant sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:46-54.
3. Fugazzotto PA. Maintenance of soft tissue closure following guided bone regeneration: Technical considerations and report of 723 cases. J Periodontol 1999;70:1085-1097.
4. Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. The palatal advanced flap: A pedicle flap for primary coverage of immediately placed implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:644-650
5. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989;9:332-343.
6. Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Becker W, et al. Treatment of fenestration and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:312-318.
7. Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: Ameta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2001;72:512-516.
8. Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, et al. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994;14:166-180.
9. Cho IW, Park JC, Shin HS. A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preserva‐ tion. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:51–63. https://doi.Org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.51
10. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: A randomized controlled clinical trial with histo‐ logic analysis. Int J Perio Restorative Dent 2012;32:421–430.
11. Kim DM, De Angelis N, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Nevins M. Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: A case series. Int J Perio Restorative Dent 2013;33:71–78. https://doi.org/10.11607/%20prd.1463
12. Mahesh L, Calvo Guirado JL, Shukla S, Kumar VR, Kumar YR. Clinical and radiographic findings without the use of bone substitute materials in extraction sockets and delayed implant placement- A case series. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):141-145. Doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.03.011.
13. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:469-77.
14. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:545-9.
15. Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:795-804.
16. Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:688-98.
17. Ekşi C. Two Cases Demonstrating the Role of Creeping Attachment in the Treatment of Keratinized Gingival Deficiency With Free Gingival Graft: A 12-Month Follow-Up. Cureus. 2023 Nov 28;15(11):e49537. Doi:10.7759/cureus.49537.
18. Goldman HM, Cohen DW. Periodontal Therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company; 1964:560.
19. Cao Y, Jiang Q, Hu J. Prophylactic therapy for prevention of surgical site infection after extraction of third molar: An overview of reviews. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e581-e587. Doi:10.4317/medoral.25999. PMID: 37471296; PMCID: PMC10635635.
20. Arteagoitia I, Rodriguez Andrés C, Ramos E. Does chlorhexidine reduce bacteremia following tooth extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195592. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195592.
21. Choi HK, Cho HY, Lee SJ, Cho IW, Shin HS, Koo KT, Lim HC, Park JC. Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Dec;47(6):372-380. Doi:10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.372.
22. Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1124-32.