Measure of accessibility to urban infrastructures for adults with physical disabilities (MAUAP): Inter-rater reliability study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Backgound - There is a challenge for rehabilitation professionals for assessing urban educational and pedestrian infrastructures and leisure facilities, to ensure accessibility for wheelchair users, blind and deaf people, and older adults with and without assistive devices. The Measure of accessibility to urban infrastructures for adults with physical disabilities (MAUAP) was developed to provide professionals with an objective and exhaustive measure of accessibility of exterior and interior urban infrastructures for adults with mobility, visual and hearing impairments. After the content development and the content validation with experts, the aim of this paper is to pursue the development of that measurement tool, the MAUAP, in evaluating inter-rater reliability.
Method- This process of developing a measurement tool in health involves an inter-reliability study which was performed by two occupational therapists. They completed 23 MAUAP evaluations of learning (educational) and leisure facilities as well as pedestrian infrastructures. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the Gwet’s AC1 statistic.
Results - The MAUAP shows good inter-rater reliability indicators in all sections: parking lot, pedestrian facilities, building access from the exterior, interior manoeuvring areas, places for learning and leisure, services, and public restroom. The 133 items had AC1 values had values rating from good or excellent. Each section of the MAUAP can be used separately, according to the evaluator’s needs.
Conclusions - Overall the MAUAP is a reliable accessibility measure of urban built environments for adults with physical disabilities (mobility, visual, hearing) which can be used in order to favour clients’ participation. This measure allows the identification of consistent accessibility recommendations and has been experimented with occupational therapists; however, the results of MAUP may interest other health professionals and as other professionals involved in conception and renovation projects, such as architects, and city planners.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
[2] Brownson RC, Hoehner M, Brennan LK, Cook RA, Elliott MB, McMullen KM. Reliability of two instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2004;1:189-207.
[3] Dannenberg AL, Cramer TW, Gibson CJ. Assessing the walkability of the workplace: a new audit tool. Am J Health Promot.2005;20(1):39-44.
[4] Emery J, Crump C, Bors P. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. Am J Health Promot.2003;18(1):38-46.
[5] Saelens BE, Frank LD, Auffrey C, Whitaker RC, Burdette HL, Colabianchi N. Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2006;3(1):190-207.
[6] Troped PJ, Cromley EK, Fragala MS, Melly SJ, Hasbrouck HH, Gortmaker SL, et al. Development and reliability and validity testing of an audit tool for trail/path characteristics: the path environment audit tool (PEAT). Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2006;3(1):158-75.
[7] Iwarsson S, Fänge A, Hovbrandt P, Carlsson G, Jarbe I, Wijk U. Occupational therapy targeting physical environmental barriers in buildings with public facilities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy.2004;67(1):29-38.
[8] McClain L. Shopping center wheelchair accessibility: ongoing advocacy to implement the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Health Nurs.2000;17(3):178-86.
[9] Rimmer J, Riley B, Wang E, Rauworth A. Development and validation of AIMFREE: Accessibility Instruments Measuring Fitness and Recreation Environments. Disabil Rehabil.2004;26(18):1087-95.
[10] Hoehner CM, Ivy A, Ramirez LKB, Handy S, Brownson RC. Active neighborhood checklist: A user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness. American Journal of Health Promotion.2007;21(6):534-7.
[11] Jones NR, Jones A, van Sluijs EM, Panter J, Harrison F, Griffin SJ. School environments and physical activity: The development and testing of an audit tool. Health Place.2010;16(5):776-83.
[12] Michael YL, Keast EM, Chaudhury H, Day K, Mahmood A, Sarte AF. Revising the senior walking environmental assessment tool. Prev Med.2009;48(3):247-9.
[13] Millington C, Ward Thompson C, Rowe D, Aspinall P, Fitzsimons C, Nelson N, et al. Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). Health Place.2009;15(2):474-81.
[14] Seymour M, Reynolds KD, Wolch J. Reliability of an audit tool for systematic assessment of urban alleyways. J Phys Act Health.2010;7(2):214-23.
[15] Spivock M, Gauvin L, Brodeur JM. Neighborhood-level active living buoys for individuals with physical disabilities. Am J Prev Med.2007;32(3):224-30.
[16] Williams JE, Evans M, Kirtland KA, Cavnar MM, Sharpe PA, Neet MJ, et al. Development and use of a tool for assessing sidewalk maintenance as an environmental support of physical activity. Health Promot Pract.2005;6(1):81-8.
[17] Stark S, Hollingsworth H, Morgan K, Chang M, Gray DB. The interrater reliability of the Community Health Environment Checklist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2008;89(11):2218-9.
[18] Thapar N, Warner G, Drainoni ML, Williams SR, Ditchfield H, Wierbicky J, et al. A pilot study of functional access to public buildings and facilities for persons with impairments. Disabil Rehabil.2004;26(5):280-9.
[19] Keysor J, Jette A, Haley S. Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med.2005;37(1):37-44.
[20] Kirchner CE, Gerber EG, Smith BC. Designed to deter. Community barriers to physical activity for people with visual or motor impairments. Am J Prev Med.2008;34(4):349-52.
[21] Evcil AN. Wheelchair accessibility to public buildings in Istanbul. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol.2009;4(2):76-85.
[22] Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, Brooks CA, Charlifue SB, Gerhart KA. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2004;85(8):1324-35.
[23] Losinsky LO, Levi T, Saffey K, Jelsma J. An investigation into the physical accessibility to wheelchair bound students of an Institution of Higher Education in South Africa. Disabil Rehabil.2003;25(7):305-8.
[24] Andrade I, Dorneles V, Ely e V. Accessibility for all: going from theory to practice. Work.2012;41 Suppl 1:3840-6.
[25] DeVellis RF. cale development. Theory and applications. 2nd edition ed: Sage Publications; 2003.
[26] Gamache S. Development of indicators measuring accessibility of urban infrastructures for adults with physical disabilities [Développement d’indicateurs de mesure de l’accessibilité aux infrastructures urbaines pour les adultes ayant des déficiences physiques] [Internet]. Québec, Canada: Université Laval; 2013. Available from: www.theses.ulaval.ca/2013/29733/29733.pdf
[27] Gwet K. Kappa statistic is not satisfactory for assessing the extent of agreement between raters. Statistical methods for inter-rater reliability assessment.2002(1):1-5.
[28] Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol.2013;13:61.
[29] Brownson RC, Hoehner M, Brennan LK, Cook RA, Elliott MB, McMullen KM. Reliability of two instrumnets for auditing the environment for physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2004;1:189-207.
[30] Dannenberg AL, Cramer TW, Gibson CJ. Assessing the walkability of the workplace: a new audit tool. American Journal of Health Promotion.2005;20(1):39-44.
[31] Emery J, Crump C, Bors P. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. American Journal of Health Promotion.2003;18(1):38-46.
[32] McClain L. Shopping center wheelchair accessibility: ongoing advocacy to implement the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Health Nursing.2000;17(3):178-86.
[33] Rimmer J, Riley B, Wang E, Rauworth A. Development and validation of AIMFREE: Accessibility Instruments Measuring Fitness and Recreation Environments. Disabil Rehabil.2004;26(18):1087-95.
[34] Michael YL, Keast EM, Chaudhury H, Day K, Mahmood A, Sarte AF. Revising the senior walking environmental assessment tool. Prev Med.2009;48(3):247-9.
[35] Seymour M, Reynolds KD, Wolch J. Reliability of an audit tool for systematic assessment of urban alleyways. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.2010;7(2):214-23.
[36] Williams JE, Evans M, Kirtland KA, Cavnar MM, Sharpe PA, Neet MJ, et al. Development and use of a tool for assessing sidewalk maintenance as an environmental support of physical activity. Health Promot Pract.2005;6(1):81-8.
[37] Stark S, Hollingsworth H, Morgan K, Chang M, Gray DB. The interrater reliability of the Community Health Environment Checklist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2008;89(11):2218-9.
[38] Gamache S, Vincent C, McFadyen BJ, Routhier F, Beauregard L, Fiset D. [Internet] Measure of accessibility to urban infrastructures for adults with physical disabilities [Mesure de l’accessibilité aux infrastructures urbaines pour les adultes présentant des déficiences physiques]. 2012 - [cited 2016-01-20]. Available from: http://www.cirris.ulaval.ca/sites/default/files/documents/mauap_version_francaise2.pdf and http://www.cirris.ulaval.ca/sites/default/files/documents/mauap_english_version2.pdf