Intrinsic Motivation and Learning Strategies: Their Impact on Pharmacy Students’ Academic Performance and Standardized Exams
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the role of motivational factors and learning strategies in predicting academic success and performance on standardized examinations among pharmacy students.
Methods: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire was used to assess students' motivation as well as their learning strategies. A retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire scores and pre-pharmacy admission characteristics, academic performance, and scores on standardized test [Pharmacy College Admission Test, Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment, and Pre-North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination and North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination ].
Results: Data from 720 students were included. Intrinsic motivation significantly correlated with GPA during semesters 3 through 5 of the pharmacy program. However, motivation scales did not show significant relationships with performance on standardized tests. Learning strategies such as metacognitive self-regulation and elaboration were commonly employed yet were not strongly correlated with grade point average or test outcomes. Resource management strategies, including time management and effort regulation, were utilized by students but did not directly predict academic success.
Conclusion: Intrinsic motivation plays a significant role in academic performance. Students with higher intrinsic motivation consistently achieved higher grade point averages, indicating the importance of fostering a sense of internal drive and commitment to the curriculum.
MESH Terms: Pharmacy Education, Learning Strategies, Self-Efficacy, Test Anxiety, Academic Performance, Motivation, Standardized Tests, Time Management, Effort Regulation
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Medina MS, Plaza CM, Stowe CD, et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 Educational Outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):162. doi:10.5688/ajpe778162
3. Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners. The Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process. Accessed April 7, 2025. https://jcpp.net/patient-care-process/
4. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. AACP Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) 2022. Published November 2022. Accessed April 7, 2025. https://www.aacp.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/coepa-document-final.pdf
5. Persky AM, Lee E, Schlesselman LS. Perception of learning versus performance as outcome measures of educational research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(7):ajpe7782. doi:10.5688/ajp e7782
6. Hardinger K, Schauner S, Graham M, Garavalia L. Admission predictors of academic dismissal for provisional and traditionally admitted students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2013;5:33-38. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2012.09.010
7. Schauner S, Hardinger KL, Graham MR, Garavalia L. Admission variables predictive of academic struggle in a PharmD program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(1):Article 8. doi:10.5688/ajpe 7718
8. Carroll CA, Garavalia LS. Factors contributing to the academic achievement of pharmacy students: use of the Goal Efficacy Framework. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(4):88. doi:10.5688/aj680488
9. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen APN. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):678-688. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04284.x
10. Credé M, Kuncel NR. Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008; 3(6):425-453. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
11. Sansgiry SS, Bhosle M, Sail K. Factors that affect academic performance among pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(5):Article 104: 1-9. doi:10.5688/aj7005104
12. Boekaerts M. Self-regulated learning: where we are today. Int J Educ Res. 1999;31(6):445-457. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
13. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan; 1991. Accessed April 8, 2025.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
14. Moulton J, Vecchiarelli C, Cheng MS. Do chosen learning strategies predict academic performance in first-year DPT anatomy students? J Phys Ther Educ. 2024;38(2):100-106. doi: 10.1097/J TE.0000000000000320.
15. Galal S, Vyas D, Ndung'u M, Wu G, Webber M. Assessing learner engagement and the impact on academic performance within a virtual learning environment. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023;11(1):36. doi:10.3390/pharmacy11010036
16. Broks VMA, Dijk SW, Van den Broek WW, Stegers-Jager KM, Woltman AM. Self-regulated learning profiles including test anxiety linked to stress and performance: a latent profile analysis based across multiple cohorts. Med Educ. 2024; 58(5):544-555. doi:10.1111/medu.15283
17. Zilundu PLM, Chibhabha F, Yu G, Fu R, Zhou LH. Pre-clinical medical students' use of motivational and cognitive study strategies during anatomy learning: a three-year cross-sectional survey. Anat Sci Educ. 2022 May;15(3):522-534. doi: 10.1002/a se.2070.
18. Almalki SA. Influence of motivation on academic performance among dental college students. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7 (8):1374-1381. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.319
19. Kauffman CA, Derazin M, Asmar A, Kibble JD. Relationship between classroom attendance and examination performance in a second-year medical pathophysiology class. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42(4):593-598. doi:10.1152/advan.00123.2018